Join us: Become a member Login
Home Page
Coming Events
Article Library
Passages Translated
Questions Answered
Study Aids
Bible Chat
Book Store
About Us
Contact Us

Our purpose is to bring to you the best, the most up-to-date, relevant information in the disciplines of:

biblical studies
science & the bible
world's great religions
biblical languages
biblical history
archaeology of bible lands
contemporary events
& current issues

that will illuminate, educate and assist you in your quest for truth.

biblescholars logo: copyright notice
© Copyright 2004
Question and Answers

Have a question?? Submit a question
Only members can submit questions, if you are not a member, join now!

Question:
Which of the many Bible commentaries to you recommend to the average reader? I like Adam Clarke and William Barkley. They both seem to use the Hebrew and Greek sources available to them. What do you think?
Answer:
To be honest with you, I don’t have any particular favorite. My own personal belief is that the Bible is its own best commentary. If one knows the Hebrew and Greek alphabets so one can utilize the lexicons, one can find a lot of material for oneself. I, of course, prefer Jewish sources over Christian sources in most instances and prefer references such as the Encyclopedia Judaica, or the Jewish Encyclopedia which is available online (www.jewishencyclopedia.com) at no charge, or the Artscroll Tanach series by Mesorah Publishing Co. The problem with Clark and Barclay is that they are both so old that much of the information is either out of date or unknown to them. The same thing is true with the Pulpit Commentary, which is 50 volumes and published around 1918 (and I happen to have an original first edition set), but, again, I find it lacking because it is so old.

Unfortunately, there is nothing with which I am acquainted that is a modern up-to-date commentary of any substance.

Roy Blizzard

  Home Page Return to Top Contact Us